Childhood Cancer
Our understanding of the factors causing childhood cancer is even
less well defined compared to that for adults. There are several
issues that cancer researchers and epidemiologists identify as important
missing pieces of the puzzle.
Statistics on Childhood Cancer
The first gap concerns the data on long-term patterns and trends
in childhood cancer in this country. Each year, the National
Cancer Institute of Canada publishes statistics on childhood
cancer for the most recent five-year period available. In 2001,
data published for 1992-96 indicate that the age-standardized incidence
rate (ASIR) for all childhood cancers was about 160 per million
children (ages 0 to 19).8 This represents
an average of 1,266 Canadian children diagnosed annually with cancer
during that time.9 Leukemia accounts for
the greatest proportion of new cancer cases (26%), followed by brain
and spinal cord cancers (17%) and lymphomas (16%).10
Some US sources state that pediatric cancer incidence has increased
by about 1% per year over the last 25 years.11,12
Certain types of childhood cancers in particular appear to have
increased, namely, acute lymphoid leukemia, tumours of the CNS and
bone tumours.13 Others, however, suggest
that while there was an apparent upsurge in the 1980s due to improved
detection (e.g., use of MRI versus CT scans) and classification
of tumours, childhood cancer rates have stabilized since the early
1990s.14 This debate is currently unresolved.15
In Canada, we are hampered by problematic statistics on national
cancer incidence among children, making it difficult to detect historical
trends with any accuracy.16,17 Health
Canada's Cancer Surveillance On-line web resource shows that
the ten-year (1984 to 1995) incidence
rate for childhood cancers (ages 0 to 19 years) hovered around
16 cases per 100,000 or 160 per million, but this snapshot of data
is insufficient to prove an increasing trend.
Carcinogenesis in the Young
Secondly, the precise mechanisms by which cancer comes about in
children are not yet clear. Childhood cancers are typically of a
different variety from those observed in adults.18
They occur more often in deeper body tissues, such as brain, bone,
and lymph glands, as opposed to cancers of the skin and internal
organs found more commonly in adults. The multistage model for carcinogenesis
outlined above does not appear to adequately address all relevant
mechanisms and susceptibility factors at different stages of development
for children.19
Greater exposure of vulnerable, developing systems to environmental
contaminants is one potential factor, and inheritance of damaged
germ cell DNA may be another associated with the eventual appearance
of cancer in children. There is both experimental and epidemiological
evidence suggesting in particular that the former mechanism, that
is, exposures in utero and during early childhood, increase
the likelihood of cancer occurrence in both children and adults.20
From toxicology we know that tissues with rapid turnover throughout
life, such as blood, skin and sperm, and tissues undergoing specific
proliferation and terminal differentiation, such as testes or breasts
during puberty, are generally more susceptible to the effects of
carcinogens. This is because there is less time for DNA repair to
occur and DNA is being called upon to carry out its varied functions.21
This fits well with a model of children's greater susceptibility
to carcinogens during development.
Surprisingly, the epidemiological evidence for prenatal exposures
and childhood cancer is limited. Case-control studies suggest that
maternal pesticide exposure during pregnancy is associated with
moderate increases in childhood brain tumours and leukemias.22
Maternal consumption of high amounts of cured meat (containing nitroso
compounds) during pregnancy has been speculated to increase the
risk of childhood brain tumours.23 A recent
review of 48 published studies on occupational parental exposures
and risk of childhood cancer concluded that the strongest evidence
of exposures that increase childhood leukemia is with paternal
exposure to solvents, paints and employment in an automobile-related
industry.24
In support of the second mechanism of pediatric carcinogenesis
(i.e., inheritance of defective germline DNA), there is some evidence
that exposures of fathers prior to conception are linked to increased
risk of cancer in their offspring. For example, paternal preconceptional
exposure to pesticides appears to enhance the risk of childhood
leukemia.25 Some studies have similarly
attributed leukemia risk in children to the occupational exposure
of their fathers to radiation.26
It appears that not all children have equivalent risk of developing
cancer regardless of the mechanisms involved. For example, Canadian
researchers are shedding light on the role of genetic variations
in enzyme systems that metabolize carcinogens and subsequent susceptibility
to childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) from exposure to pesticides.27
Children with ALL frequently displayed alterations in a specific
carcinogen-detoxifying gene. This genetic mutation was most common
in children of mothers treated with a chemotherapy drug during pregnancy.28
PREVIOUS
| NEXT
|